State v. Kaplan
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Judge.
We note at the outset that defendant’s brief makes no reference to any exceptions in the record on appeal. For the failure to abide by the rules of appellate procedure, specifically Rule 28, Rules of Practice in the Court of Appeals of North Carolina, defendant’s appeal is subject to dismissal upon the grounds that he has abandoned all exceptions. However, we have chosen to decide this case on its merits in view of defendant’s notion that the case has grave constitutional import.
Appellant first assigns as error the court’s denial of his motion to continue. The motion was…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Moore v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hester v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- State v. GoldbergSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- State v. SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. SchmidtMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976