Legal Opinion

Miller v. Citizens National Trust & Savings Bank

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 19, 1934No. Civ. 8584PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIS, J., pro tem.

Appellants, plaintiffs below, brought suit against respondent bank and Paul A. Wickham to recover damages resulting from wrongful and fraudulent acts of Wickham. The case was submitted on the pleadings and a written stipulation of facts which the lower court adopted as its findings, and thereon made its conclusion that plaintiffs were entitled to take nothing from respondent bank.

At the time of the acts complained of herein Wickham was the employee and agent of the bank and was given the title of “Manager Escrow Department” in its Larchmont Avenue branch in Los Angeles.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Otis Elevator Co. v. First Nat'l Bank of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Walsh v. HuntCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Johnson v. MonsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Stephenson v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Bank of Cal. v. W. Union Tel. Co.California Supreme Court · 1877

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Carr v. Wm. C. Crowell Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Rutherford v. Rideout BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Hiroshima v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Transcontinental & Western Air, Inc. v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Grigsby v. HaglerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API