Legal Opinion
Jadwin v. Kasal
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 7, 1982No. 81-677PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETERSON, Justice.
This appeal in an action to foreclose a mechanics lien arises out of the construction of a home for respondents Paul and Carol Kasai. Sandra Jadwin commenced this action to foreclose a mechanics lien against the Kasals, joining as defendants the Federal Land Bank of St. Paul (bank) and Kump Lumber, Inc. (Kump). Jadwin’s claims were settled before trial, so the issues litigated were those arising out of Kump’s cross-complaint against the Kasals for the balance due on building materials supplied by Kump and out of the bank’s prayer that the amount, validity and priority…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Reuben E. Johnson Co. v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- M. E. Kraft Excavating & Grading Co. v. Barac Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Poppler v. O'CONNORSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Malmin v. GrabnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Carlson v. MaughmerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Riverview Muir Doran, LLC v. JADT Development Group, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Bolander v. BolanderCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- Bloomington Electric Co. v. Freeman's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Gopher Oil Co., Inc. v. Union Oil Co. of CaliforniaDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1991
- Sprangers v. Interactive Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.