Legal Opinion
Sprangers v. Interactive Technologies, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 30, 1986No. C3-85-2358PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
This case turns on whether an oral agreement or a later written document constitutes the contract between the parties; resolution of that issue determines the date of purchase of stock and how many shares of stock are owed. James Sprangers (on behalf of himself and as the agent of John Sprangers, Richard Sprangers, Daniel Freier, and Michael Verhulst, all named plaintiffs [hereinafter Sprangers]) sued Interactive Technologies, Inc. (ITI), for breach of contract for failure to deliver the full number of shares of ITI stock which he was allegedly owed. The jury awarded…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Aaron v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Donnay v. BoulwareSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto's, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Golden v. Oahe Enterprises, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- TROOIEN v. MansourCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Moodie-Yannotti v. Swan (In Re Swan)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
- Trivectra v. UshijimaHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
- Foley v. AllardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Dinco v. Dylex LimitedCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.