Legal Opinion

Poppler v. O'CONNOR

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 14, 1975No. 45428PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The two issues raised by plaintiff mortgagees on appeal from a judgment in a mortgage foreclosure action are whether the trial court applied the proper burden of proof in determining that defendant mortgagors established partial payment of the mortgage debt and whether, if plaintiffs prevail on that issue, attorneys fees are allowable to plaintiffs on appeal in addition to the attorneys fees already awarded plaintiffs by the trial court. Because the trial court may have incorrectly assumed that the burden of proof on defendants’ claim of partial payment rested upon plaintiffs, we remand but…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Eilola v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  2. Obraske v. WoodySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  3. Stevens v. Minneapolis Fire Department Relief Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  4. Gerhardt v. WelchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  5. Bierlein v. GagnonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Jadwin v. KasalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. Helm v. El Rehbein & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. State v. FolkertCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Schaub v. KortgardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. State, Ex Rel. Pula v. BeehlerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API