Legal Opinion

Young v. Stephenson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 10, 1921No. 10701PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error from District Court, Tulsa County; Redmond S. Cole, Judge. Action by James A. Stephenson and others against F. A. Young for balance of purchase price of corporation stock. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILL, J.

This action was-commenced in the district court of Tulsa county by James A. Stephenson, William Hargis Walker, and S. DeZell Hawley against F. A. Young.' The allegations of the petition were that said pl’aintiffs had sold to F. A. Young 6,000 shares of stock of Okmulgee Producing & Refining Company for $15 per share, and received in payment certain cash and three notes in the sum of $14,400 each and an agreement upon behalf of Young to • pay $19,550 in 30 days. That all of said amounts were due and unpaid., and judgment was prayed for said amounts and interest.

Tlie defendant, Young, answered,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Bibb v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Clews v. JamiesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Embrey v. JemisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Plumb v. CampbellIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Kernochan v. . MurrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1888

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Roxana Petroleum Co. v. GoldrickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. State Ex Rel. State Insurance Fund v. Great Plains Care Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  3. In Re Ben Kennedy and Associates, Inc., Debtor. Kenneth L. Spears, Trustee v. St. Paul Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  4. Carlile v. HarmonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Taylor v. StarrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API