Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Reading Transit Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 11, 1930No. Appeal 279, 280, 281PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

There are three appeals from judgments on verdicts (1) for a two year old child, (2) for Nona Thompson, who was driving her husband’s car, and (3) for her husband. Any doubt that we may have had about the judgments for the adults, after considering the arguments made on these appeals, has been removed by Schaeffer v. Reading Transit Co., 302 Pa. 220, decided since they were argued here.

Mrs. Thompson, with the child seated beside her, drove southward on the pike from Reading toward Philadelphia, reached the village of Reiffton, where she lived, and left the pike by a right…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Knobeloch v. Pittsburgh, Harmony, Butler & New Castle Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Weiss v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Schaeffer v. Reading Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Weschler v. Buffalo & Lake Erie Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Kuhns v. Conestoga Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shearer v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Hoffman v. GeorgeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Powell v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API