Legal Opinion

Powell v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 25, 1933No. Appeal 96PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

At the time of the events hereinafter described, Second Street, running north and south in the Borough of Wilmerding, was unimproved; it intersected Middle Street, an improved east and west street, at right angles; that street is twenty-one feet and three inches wide, and two tracks of the defendant street railway company are laid thereon. Earl Powell, plaintiff below, lived on Second Street, some fifty feet north of Middle. About daybreak on October 23,1929, he started to his place of employment, driving his Durant coupe south on Second and intending to proceed west…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mountain v. American Window Glass Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  2. Schaeffer v. Reading Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Weschler v. Buffalo & Lake Erie Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Thompson v. Reading Transit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brungo v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Shearer v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Hoffman v. GeorgeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API