Kuhns v. Conestoga Traction Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Walling,
The Lincoln Highway extends westerly from Lancaster to Columbia, and in 1919 a Mr. Stradman was erecting a dwelling on the south side of this highway and about one hundred feet therefrom. Defendant’s single track railway extended along the south line of the highway, while in front of the Stradman house, about eight feet south of the track, and parallel therewith, was a hedge some twelve feet high and over a hundred feet long. A driveway extending south from the highway across the track passed by the east end of the hedge and thence to the Stradman house. At about…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Callahan v. Philadelphia Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
- Tatarewicz v. United Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- Hanley v. WaxmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- King v. Pittsburgh, Harmony, Butler & New Castle Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- Mackey v. Philadelphia & West Chester Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Wilson v. Consolidated Dressed Beef Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Muehlhof v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Scholl v. Philadelphia Suburban Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Schaeffer v. Reading Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Ehrhart v. York Rys. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.