Shearer v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Rhodes, J.,
Opinion by
This is an action in trespass, and the one question raised on this appeal is whether plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. Plaintiff received personal injuries as the result of defendant’s negligence. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff. Defendant’s motions for judgment n.o.v. and for a new trial were refused, and judgment was entered on the verdict. Defendant has appealed, and assigns as error the refusal of its motion for judgment n.o.v.
When the testimony is viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiff, as we are required to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kilpatrick v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Caulton v. Eyre Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Schaeffer v. Reading Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Ehrhart v. York Rys. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Weschler v. Buffalo & Lake Erie Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hoffman v. GeorgeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Swilley v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Boyle v. Lehigh Valley Transit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Dowbenko v. Philadelphia Transportation Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1948
- Levine v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.