Legal Opinion
In re Apple iPhone 3G Products Liability Litigation
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 9, 2012No. MDL No. C 09-02045 JWPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO COMPEL ARBITRATION; DENYING AS MOOT MOTION TO DISMISS
JAMES WARE, Chief Judge.
Presently before the Court are: (1) Defendant AT & T Mobility’s Motion to Compel Arbitration;1 (2) Defendant Apple’s Motion to Compel Arbitration;2 and (3) Defendant Apple’s Motion to Dismiss.3 The Court conducted a hearing on April 9, 2012. Based on the papers submitted to date and oral argument, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motions to Compel Arbitration and DENIES as moot Defendant Apple’s Motion to Dismiss.
A. Background
A detailed summary of the factual allegations and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Shroyer v. New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Soto v. American Honda Motor Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
- In re Apple iPhone Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Burgoon v. Narconon of Northern CaliforniaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Van Zant v. Apple, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Borgman v. Yamaha Motor Corporation USADistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.