Legal Opinion
State v. Taylor
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 16, 1999No. C3-98-1615PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
AMUNDSON, Judge.
The state challenges a pretrial order requiring it to show that notice was given to respondent of his ineligibility to possess a shotgun pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 624.713 (1996). Defendant-respondent argues that' the district court erred by denying respondent’s motion to suppress evidence based on an illegal search and seizure. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
FACTS
On December 7, 1997, police responded to a report of shots fired in a St. Paul home. The report also indicated that a male had a shotgun and was pointing it at a female. When officers investigated, an…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. OthoudtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- State v. SotoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. DendyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. BunceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- State v. KoubaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- McDermott v. Minnesota Teachers Retirement FundCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000