Legal Opinion

McDermott v. Minnesota Teachers Retirement Fund

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 9, 2000No. C2-99-1678Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HALBROOKS, Judge

Relators James Patrick McDermott and Robert John Gunderson challenge a decision by the Board of Trustees of the Minnesota Teachers Retirement Association (TRA Board) determining that the reemployed-annuitant earnings limitation set out in Minn.Stat. §§ 354.41, subd. 4b, 354.44, subd. 5 (1998), applies to relators’ entitlement to receive retirement benefits from the Teachers Retirement Association (TRA). Relators argue that because their current employer, Education Minnesota (EdMn), does not employ “persons who are covered by the Minnesota teachers retirement association…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Mattson v. FlynnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. Mammenga v. State Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. Stang v. Minnesota Teachers Retirement Ass'n Board of TrusteesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  5. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API