Legal Opinion
State v. Dendy
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 20, 1999No. C4-99-287PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHUMAKER, Judge
The state challenges the trial court’s dismissal of a criminal complaint charging unlawful possession of a shotgun by a person convicted of a drug offense. The trial court held that the prohibition does not apply to shotguns and that respondent never received the requisite notice of ineligibility to possess a firearm. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
On November 5, 1998, St. Paul police officers executed a search warrant at Samuel Earl Dendy’s home. When the officers searched between the mattress and box spring of the bed that Dendy and his wife shared, they found a 20-gauge…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. Joon Kyu KimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. ZanterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- State v. SotoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Bol v. ColeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Wegener v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. TreiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- State v. MelandCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- State v. KNAEBLECourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- State v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- In Re GuyotUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.