Legal Opinion
Shoemaker v. Leeper
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 3, 1951No. 4131PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PICKETT, Circuit Judge.
Everett Shoemaker and Clarence W. Shoemaker brought this action against Art Leeper, 1 for damages alleged to have resulted from fraudulent misrepresentations as to facts which induced the plaintiffs to invest in certain prospective oil properties belonging to the defendant. The case was tried to the court without a jury and this appeal is from a judgment for the. defendant.
The defendant owned a block of oil leases in Kay County, Oklahoma, upon which he had drilled an oil well to the depth of about 2,500 feet. There had been some previous oil development in the vicinity…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners v. Sperry Ex Rel. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
- Deardorf v. RosenbuschSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- Berry v. StevensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Beard v. Achenbach Memorial Hospital Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
- Jones v. GrinnellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. First Sec. Bank of Utah, N.A. United States v. Allen. United States v. Cota (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1953
- American Home Fire Assur. Co. of New York v. Mid-West Enterprise Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
- Brown v. American Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- Ottinger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- Ottinger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.