Huttlinger v. Far West Enterprises, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
Plaintiff sued to recover a broker’s commission of 5 per cent on a real estate transaction of $175,000. He appeals from an adverse judgment based on findings of fact and conclusions of law showing the following grounds for the denial of the commission:(1) that the agreement of sale procured by plaintiff was unenforceable because fatally uncertain and illusory;(2) that plaintiff and defendant signed said agreement in the mutual mistaken belief that the purchaser procured by plaintiff was ready, able and willing to perform the agreement as signed, that said purchaser never was so ready, able…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Panno v. RussoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Krobitzsch v. MiddletonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- White v. ReskinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
3Cited by10 opinions
- Loughan v. Harger-HaldemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Scott v. Federal Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Goss v. HillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
- Richfield Oil Corp. v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Silva v. National American Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.