Legal Opinion

White v. Reskin

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 30, 1928No. Docket No. 4993PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALENTINE, J., pro tem.

This was an action for broker’s commission on sale of real estate. The case was tried upon a stipulated statement of facts, and no other evidence was introduced. Judgment was rendered for plaintiff, from which judgment the defendant appeals. Further facts are stated in the opinion.

Appellant first contends that Evans, the agent (plaintiff’s assignor), did not produce a purchaser ready and willing to purchase the property described in the agency contract, nor upon the terms therein set forth, because no location is given for the property nor is the city and county…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tuso v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Thoroman v. DavidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Miller v. SearsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Mott v. MinorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
  5. Pehl v. FantonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Caras v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. Huttlinger v. Far West Enterprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Seward v. A. C. Gage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API