Legal Opinion
DeFina v. Latimer
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided August 22, 1977No. 77-C-650PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum of Decision and Order
MISHLER, Chief Judge.
Defendants Latimer, Shearer, Bartel, Kelley and Bienieck move to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) F.R. Civ.P., on the ground that it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.1
The complaint, which purports to state five claims in 111 paragraphs and 34 pages, charges ten defendants with entering into a conspiracy “of psychological methods, false swearing, false accusations and other unconstitutional and illegal methods . . ” (par. 16). Plaintiff, a lawyer admitted to practice in the State of New York, alleges…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Prezzi v. BerzakDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
- Boruski v. StewartDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Thomas W. Shaw v. Dolph Briscoe, Governor of TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Choate v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Flanagan v. ShivelyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- United States v. Bonanno Organized Crime Family of La Cosa NostraDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1988
- Holsey v. CollinsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1981
- Larsen v. JBC Legal Group, P.C.District Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- ATES v. GEICO INSURANCE AGENCY, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2024
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.