Legal Opinion

Boruski v. Stewart

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 13, 1974No. 74 Civ. 2078 (MP)PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POLLACK, District Judge.

Motions are before the Court on behalf of the defendants to dismiss this suit for insufficiency of the claim, lack of jurisdiction, res judicata, the bar of limitations and prolixity of the complaint. The plaintiff, on the other hand, seeks summary judgment in his favor for alleged failure of the defendants to timely plead to the complaint as amended.

This is a pro se action posited on the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1985 and 1986, charging 37 present or former federal Army Air Force officers, federal personnel, federal judges, federal attorneys and a federal…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Barr v. MatteoSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Gregoire v. BiddleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  5. Levering & Garrigues Co. v. MorrinSupreme Court of the United States · 1933

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Fred M. Anderson and Wayne Nelson, Fred M. Anderson v. Thomas Coughlin, Commissioner, New York State Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  2. In Re Reverend Clovis Carl Green, JrCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  3. Anne M. Pavilonis v. Edward J. KingCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
  4. Alharbi v. MillerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2019
  5. Holsey v. CollinsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1981

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API