Legal Opinion

Remington v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 23, 1994No. 12560PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLavery, J.

The plaintiff, Virginia Remington, appeals from the trial court’s judgment granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly determined as a matter of law that the decedent, William K. Remington, was not a resident of the plaintiff’s household and, thus, was not a family member eligible for underinsured motorist coverage under the terms of the plaintiff’s automobile insurance policy issued by the defendant. We agree with the plaintiff and reverse the judgment of the trial court.

William K. Remington, the stepson of the plaintiff, was…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Suarez v. Dickmont Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. Hammer v. Lumberman's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  3. Connell v. ColwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  4. Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. Carriage Lane AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  5. Aetna Life & Casualty Co. v. BulaongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Sjogren v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
  2. Girard v. WeissConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  3. Schratwieser v. Hartford Casualty InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  4. Remington v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  5. Rosenfield v. CymbalaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API