Legal Opinion

Sjogren v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided December 4, 1997No. 96-49-AppealPublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LEDERBERG, Justice.

Does an insurance policy’s definition of the term “relative” include a stepson from a former marriage? On the facts of the case before us, we conclude that it does. The plaintiffs, Donald Sjogren, Vida Sjogren, and Dean Ramos, appealed to the Supreme Court from a summary judgment entered in the Superior Court in favor of the defendant, Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates (Metropolitan). The plaintiffs brought their complaint after Metropolitan denied their claim under the uninsured motorists provisions of an automobile insurance policy…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Accent Store Design, Inc. v. Marathon House, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
  2. Rotelli v. CatanzaroSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
  3. Mallane v. Holyoke Mutual Insurance Co. in SalemSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1995
  4. Amica Mutual Insurance v. StreickerSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1990
  5. Malo v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Estate of Giuliano v. GiulianoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  2. Frost Ex Rel. Anderson v. WhitbeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Hendrick v. HendrickSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
  4. Plainfield Pike Gas & Convenience, LLC v. 1889 Plainfield Pike Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2010
  5. American Commerce Insurance v. PortoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API