Legal Opinion
Doe v. Cutter Biological
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided September 5, 1991No. Civ. A. 91-2466PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
FELDMAN, District Judge.
Before the Court is the plaintiffs’ motion to remand or in the alternative to stay these proceedings. For the reasons that follow, the plaintiffs’ motion to remand is GRANTED.
On May 21, 1991, the plaintiffs filed suit in state court against Cutter Biological, A Division of Miles, Inc., the Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund, Tulane Medical School, and Dr. Andres. Jane Doe has hemophilia and from 1981 to 1990 was treated at the Tulane Medical School in a program called the Louisiana Comprehensive Hemophilia Care Program. Dr. Andres was the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wilson v. Republic Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- B., Inc. v. Miller Brewing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Donald J. Willy, and George A. Young v. The Coastal Corp., Coastal States Management Co., Inc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Thais Carriere, Widow of Samuel Carriere, Iv, Individually and on Behalf of Her Minor Child v. Sears, Roebuck and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- In Re Ben CarterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re Norplant Contraceptive Products Liability Lit.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1995
- Rivers v. International Matex Tank TerminalDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1994
- Jamison v. Kerr-McGee Corp.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2001
- Doe v. Armour Pharmaceutical Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1993
- Englande v. SMITHKLINEDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.