Legal Opinion
Doe v. Armour Pharmaceutical Co.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided September 21, 1993No. Civ. A. 93-0514, 93-1474, 93-1475, 93-1476, 93-2069, 93-2142, 93-2331 and 93-2425PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
MENTZ, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on motions to remand to state court or alternatively to stay proceedings filed by plaintiffs in each of several lawsuits involving hemophiliacs infected with the HIV virus. The Court took these motions under submission without oral argument and now GRANTS the motions to remand as follows.
I. THE PARTIES
Each of these eight lawsuits 1 has been brought on behalf of hemophiliacs and their relatives against Tulane Medical School 2 (Tulane), Dr. W. Abe Andes (Dr. Andes), and a varying combination of three alleged manufacturers of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Pullman Co. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- B., Inc. v. Miller Brewing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Richard J. Dodson v. Spiliada Maritime Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Thais Carriere, Widow of Samuel Carriere, Iv, Individually and on Behalf of Her Minor Child v. Sears, Roebuck and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Horton Ex Rel. Horton v. Scripto-Tokai Corp.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1995
- Gandy v. CromptonDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1999
- Englande v. SMITHKLINEDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2002
- Johnson v. Scimed, Inc.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2000