Legal Opinion
Englande v. SMITHKLINE
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided February 8, 2002No. CIV.A. 01-3743PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
FELDMAN, District Judge.
Before the Court is the plaintiffs Motion to Remand or alternatively, Motion to Stay. For the reasons that follow, the motion to remand is GRANTED.
Background
Andrew Englande claims that he suffered injuries during his participation in a clinical trial of the drug. Lotrafiban. On August 2, 2001, Englande filed a medical malpractice complaint with the Louisiana Patients’ Compensation Fund against Dr. Bruce Iteld, Daphne Dureau, RN, and the Louisiana Heart Center, and requested a panel review of his claims. The next day, Englande sued Dr. Iteld, Dureau,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Acuna v. Brown & Root Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Barbara Allen v. R & H Oil & Gas Company, Farrar Oilfield Service and Equipment Co., and Tri-State Oil Services, Inc., Tri-State Oil Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- De Aguilar v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- B., Inc. v. Miller Brewing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Adrian Cavallini v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fidelity Homestead Ass'n v. Hanover InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2006
- Course v. Walgreen Louisiana Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2020
- Terral J. Frierson, et al. v. Ochsner Medical Center–Northshore, LLC, et al.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2025