Legal Opinion

Hakalau Plantation Co. v. Kahuena

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1902PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Exceptions from Circuit Court, Fourth Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

FREAR, C.J. (Galbraith, J., dissenting.)

This is a statutory action to- quiet title under Civ. L., Oh. 113. The plaintiff alleged, as is usual in such cases, (1) that it had title, (2) that the defendants claimed adversely and (3) that their claim was unfounded. The defendants answered with a general denial. The Circuit Court, holding that this answer amounted toi a disclaimer and that it put the defendants out of court, allowed the plaintiff to prove its case, and not only did not permit the defendants to prove any adverse claim, hut refused to permit them to controvert…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Stark v. StarrsSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  2. Wall v. MagnesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
  3. Pennie v. HildrethCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Elder v. SpinksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Kahoiwai v. LimaeuHawaii Supreme Court · 1896

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kudlich v. CiciarelliHawaii Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Mossman v. DoleHawaii Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Young Tin Yau v. Ching Sing WoHawaii Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Kualoa Ranch, Inc. v. MitchellHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API