Legal Opinion

State v. Lichty

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 11, 1991No. 89-1147; CA A65661PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Defendant was indicted for possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(4). The trial court granted his motion to suppress cocaine found in plain view in his automobile. The state appeals. ORS 138.060(3). The issue is whether the stop was based on a reasonable suspicion that defendant was in possession of a controlled substance. Under the totality of the circumstances, the police officer’s suspicion was not reasonable, and we affirm.

The facts are not disputed. On June 7, 1989, a clerk in the Quick Shop Minit Mart in Rainier found a wallet on the counter. The clerk handed it to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. ValdezOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. GirardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. State v. FaulknerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  4. State v. SheltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. State v. SheltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. LichtyOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API