Legal Opinion

State v. Shelton

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 13, 1991No. 87-2550-C-2; CA A61575PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Defendant petitions for review of our decision that the trial court erred in suppressing certain evidence. State v. Shelton, 103 Or App 179, 796 P2d 390 (1990). Treating the petition as one for reconsideration, ORAP 9.15(1), we allow it, modify our opinion and adhere to it as modified.

Defendant was indicted for possession of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992(4), after having been observed chewing objects that a police officer recognized as paperfolds commonly used for carrying cocaine. The trial court granted defendant’s motion to suppress the paperfolds, stating only that it was an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. McCroryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  3. State v. WandleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  4. State v. SheltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  5. State v. SheltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. LichtyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. State v. MorelliCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. State v. LippertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. State v. LippertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. State v. LippertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API