Legal Opinion

State v. Shelton

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 29, 1990No. 87-2550-C-2; CA A61575PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Defendant was indicted for possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(4). The state appeals, for the second time, from an order granting defendant’s motion to suppress evidence obtained as the result of a street stop. On the first appeal, we reversed and remanded for findings of fact and conclusions of law. State v. Shelton, 95 Or App 127, 767 P2d 496 (1989). We now reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Medford Police Officer Churma had had several contacts with defendant in which defendant appeared to be under the influence of cocaine. On the night of August 27, 1987, while on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. McCroryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  2. State v. EisenbarthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  3. State v. SheltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. SheltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. State v. LichtyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. State v. MorelliCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API