Legal Opinion

State v. Wright

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 22, 1992No. 90D-106823; CA A68328PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*569EDMONDS, J.

Defendant was charged with driving under the influence of intoxicants in violation of a city ordinance. He moved to suppress evidence obtained from the stop preceding his arrest on the ground that it was not based on a reasonable suspicion. ORS 131.615. The trial court granted his motion, and the state appeals. We reverse.

At the suppression hearing, the arresting officer testified that, when he arrived on the scene, defendant had already been stopped by Sergeant Martino. The trial court sustained defendant’s objection, on hearsay grounds, to any testimony by the arresting officer…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. State v. ValdezOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Guedon v. RooneyOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  4. State v. CrumalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  5. State v. RandOregon Supreme Court · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. WrightOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. FoleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. State v. McClellanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. State v. WrightOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API