Legal Opinion
MacHado v. MacHado
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 17, 1944No. Civ. No. 14532PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
66 Cal.App.2d 401 (1944)
DOMINGO MACHADO, Appellant,
v.
JOHN H. MACHADO et al., Respondents.
Civ. No. 14532.
California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Two.
Oct. 17, 1944.
O. B. De Camp and Darwin H. Wolford for Appellant.
Nelson & Castro for Respondents.
MOORE, P. J.
Appellant sued to set aside a judgment of the superior court in a partition action on the ground that it had been obtained by extrinsic fraud perpetrated upon him. Demurrers having been sustained without leave to amend, the action was dismissed as to demurring defendants by judgment from which this appeal was lodged. The following…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- The Edward Barron Estate Co. v. the Woodruff Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Marriner v. DennisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Karlslyst v. FrazierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Church v. ChurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Gutterman v. GallyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- McCue v. Bruce Enterprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1964
- Brogoitti Et Ux v. Brown Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1962
- Estate of JoslynCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Estate of BodgerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Yurkas v. ZampattiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.