Legal Opinion
Lees v. Middlesex Insurance
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 28, 1994No. 14670PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPalmer, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the trial court properly granted summary judgment for the defendant, Middlesex Insurance Company, on the ground that the plaintiff, Marion Lees, had failed to allege valid claims under the Connecticut Unfair Insurance Practices Act (CUIPA); General Statutes (Rev. to 1981) § 38-60 et seq.;1 and the Connecticut *844Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA). General Statutes § 42-110a et seq.2 The plaintiff appealed from the judgment of the trial court to the Appellate Court, and we transferred the appeal to this court pursuant to Practice Book § 4023 and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mead v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. Carriage Lane AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State v. IndrisanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Quimby v. Kimberly Clark Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Lees v. Middlesex InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Heyman Associates No. 1 v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Napoletano v. CIGNA Healthcare of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Tucker v. American International Group, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
- Belz v. Peerless InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
- Karas v. Liberty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.