Legal Opinion

Barker v. Boettger

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1924PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Seeger, J.:

The facts are stated in detail in the petition and return.

The property in question is situated between Locust Hill avenue and Palisade avenue. The owners are engaged in the erection of a large apartment house containing one hundred apartments upon Locust Hill avenue, a residential street, and a two-story garage, upon the Palisade avenue side of the lot, planned to accommodate one hundred automobiles, thirty-five upon the first floor, which is to be a public garage with entrance upon Palisade avenue, and sixty-five upon the second floor, and said to be intended to accommodate only…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Board of Zoning Appeals v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  2. St. Patrick's Church Corporation v. DanielsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  3. Village of Great Neck Estates v. Bemak & Lehman, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Sharp v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  5. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. RuppDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API