General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Rupp
District Court, D. Utah
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ALDON J. ANDERSON, Senior District Judge.
I. Introduction
It is to be regretted that the peace and quiet of this old residential neighborhood
should be disturbed by automobiles, but, no matter how great a nuisance automobiles and apartment houses may be, they have come to provide a means to solve the great question of housing and traffic, and in congested communities it is a great problem to find places for the erection of buildings for the storage of these useful, but annoying vehicles.
Barker v. Boettger, 124 Misc. 461, 208 N.Y.S. 295 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1924).
Appellant General Motors…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. SweetArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. HaleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- Christensen v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- Stahl v. Utah Transit AuthorityUtah Supreme Court · 1980
- Meyer v. General American Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Citicorp National Services, Inc. v. Lomax (In re Lomax)District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1993