Marriage of Bowers v. Bowers
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1DissentArmstrong, J.
The majority holds that husband is a prevailing party under the antenuptial agreement and, therefore, is entitled to recover attorney fees at trial in this dissolution proceeding. I disagree. Contrary to the majority’s view, the attorney-fee provision in the parties’ antenuptial agreement is unenforceable in a dissolution proceeding, because it is contrary to public policy to control a court’s discretion to award attorney fees in such a proceeding. It follows, then, *32that the trial court properly denied husband an award of attorney fees under the agreement.
ORS 108.710 controls the permissible…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re the Marriage of HaguewoodOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Matter of Marriage of EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Matter of Marriage of PurcellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989