Legal Opinion
In Re Terkeltoub
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 8, 1966No. Misc. 11-188PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
FRANKEL, District Judge.
This is an application to compel a witness to give to a grand jury testimony he claims is privileged. The circumstances leading to the refusal are these:
On April 20, 1966, Vincent M. Fiorillo was named in an indictment charging that he had committed perjury before a federal grand jury when he denied having had certain telephone conversations with one Tony Vone. Fiorillo has pleaded not guilty. Pretrial motions have been heard, and the case is being readied for trial. Fiorillo is represented by Solomon B. Terkeltoub, who has been at the bar for some 32 years.
On…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Coplon v. United States (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- United States v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- In the Matter of Carl Walsh, a Witness Before the Special September 1978 Grand Jury. Appeal of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- In the Matter of Grand Jury Proceedings. Frank J. Duffy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- In Re Grand Jury Matters, Appeal of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.