Legal Opinion
Kogan v. Schenley Industries, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided December 12, 1956No. Civ. A. No. 1790PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CALEB M. WRIGHT, District Judge.
This is a derivative shareholder’s suit for treble damages predicated upon a violation of the Clayton Act.1 While the factual background is complex, the following brief summarization will suffice in order to dispose of the motion now under consideration.
Defendant, Sehenley Industries, Inc., (hereinafter referred to as Sehenley) became the majority shareholder of the nominal defendant, Park & Tilford Distillers Corporation (hereinafter referred to as Park & Tilford) by acquiring 88 percent of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Park & Tilford. As a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United Copper Securities Co. v. Amalgamated Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Fleitmann Ex Rel. Stockholders of the Consolidated Street Lighting Co. v. Welsbach Street Lighting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Mt. Vernon-Woodberry Cotton Duck Co. v. Alabama Interstate Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Ring v. SpinaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Fanchon & Marco, Inc. v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gottesman v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963
- Rogers v. American Can Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
- Sam S. Goldstein Industries, Inc. v. Botany Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Rogers v. American Can Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1960
- Rogers v. American Can CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962