Legal Opinion
Sam S. Goldstein Industries, Inc. v. Botany Industries, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 22, 1969No. 68 Civil 3986PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HERLANDS, District Judge:
Defendant has moved pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b) (6) to dismiss plaintiff’s amended complaint essentially for asserted pleading insufficiencies. Alternatively, defendant moves the Court to strike certain allegations as immaterial, Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(f), and to stay this action pending determination of a trademark cancellation proceeding instituted by defendant in the United States Patent Office.
I
Plaintiff’s amended complaint (amended pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a) ) is 'structured in three counts [denominated in the amended complaint as “causes of action”]. So…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Lorain Journal Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Radiant Burners, Inc. v. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Julius Nagler v. Admiral CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Goya Foods, Inc. v. Tropicana Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Hunt v. Mobil Oil CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- C-Cure Chemical Co., Inc. v. Secure Adhesives Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1983
- Continental Connector Corp. v. Continental Specialties Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1976
- Carlson Companies, Inc. v. The Sperry and Hutchinson Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.