Legal Opinion

People v. Spencer

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 5, 1911No. Crim. No. 320PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of drawing and uttering a bank check with the intent thereby to defraud Watson, Pond & Riddle, a corporation.

The prosecution was had under section 476a of the Penal Code, which section reads as follows:

“Every person who willfully, with intent to defraud, makes or draws, or utters, or delivers to another person any check or draft on a bank . . . , knowing at the time of such making, drawing, uttering or delivery that he has not sufficient funds in or credit with such bank, ... to meet such check or draft in full upon its presentation, is punishable by…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. People v. EppingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. People v. TapiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. People v. SimonsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. People v. ArmstrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. FreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. People v. VertreesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. State v. DixsonMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  4. People v. OsakiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. People v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API