People v. Armstrong
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County and from an order denying a new trial. Wheaton A. Gray, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Britt, C.
1. On the night of July 25,1895, a horse, two bridles, and a saddle were stolen from the premises of the brothers Sisler in Tulare county. Defendant was convicted of the theft of the horse under an information in which the animal was described as the “ property of *573George P. Sisler and Sam Sisler.” The evidence showed that Samuel was the full given name of the person called Sam Sisler in the information, though he was commonly known by the latter designation in the community where he lived. Appellant contends that here was a case of fatal variance between allegation and proof. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. RolfeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- People v. LeonardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- People v. Leong QuongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- People v. MorineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- People v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. SantoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- People v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- People v. NegraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.