Brennen v. City of Eugene
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*1095TANZER, J.
The issue in this civil case is whether plaintiff has stated a cause of action against the City of Eugene. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment on the pleadings entered by the circuit court after it sustained defense motions to strike both counts of plaintiffs second amended complaint and plaintiff refused to plead further.
Plaintiff alleged the following facts which, for purposes of this appeal, we assume to be true. The Eugene Municipal Code requires any taxicab operator to obtain a license before doing business within the city limits. The code also requires an applicant for such a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stigler v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
- Leger v. KelleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Duran v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
- Georges v. TudorCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
- Klerk v. Tektronix, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brennen v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Dinsky v. Town of FraminghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Rogers v. City of ToppenishCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
- McDonald v. Title Ins. Co. of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Eldridge v. Sandoval CountyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.