Legal Opinion
Duran v. City of Tucson
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided May 15, 1973No. 2 CA-CIV 1315PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOWARD, Judge.
In this appeal appellants claim that appellees should be liable for personal injuries Mr. Duran sustained as a result of an alleged negligent inspection by the City of Tucson Fire Department.
Since the court granted summary judgment in favor of appellees, we view the record in the light most favorable to appellants.
On February 18, 1971, Manuel Duran was working at his place of employment, Dietz & Sons Body Shop in Tucson, Arizona. He had been employed for approximately three days. While he was removing gasoline from an automobile gas tank in the shop, the fumes were ignited…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- H. R. Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Stone v. Arizona Highway CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Schuster v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
- Riss v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Bernardine v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Trianon Park Condominium v. City of HialeahSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Coffey v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Shore v. Town of StoningtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Brennen v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Adams v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.