Rogers v. City of Toppenish
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtMunson, J.
The defendants, City of Toppenish and Ronald Kramer, 1 appeal a judgment arising out of a claim of negligent representation. The principal issue is whether a municipal employee is liable, and the municipality vicariously liable, to a buyer of property for a negligent representation of the zoning classification of that property if the buyer justifiably relies upon the representation and suffers economic loss. We affirm.
The plaintiff, Joe Rogers, was a real estate broker in Toppenish. The defendant, Ronald Kramer, was the city building inspector, whose job included administration of the zoning…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Coffey v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- King v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Evangelical United Brethren Church v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- Adams v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Taylor v. Stevens CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Bailey v. Town of ForksWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Dinsky v. Town of FraminghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- J & B Development Co. v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Meaney v. DoddWashington Supreme Court · 1988
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.