Legal Opinion

Rogers v. City of Toppenish

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 14, 1979No. 2685-3PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMunson, J.

The defendants, City of Toppenish and Ronald Kramer, 1 appeal a judgment arising out of a claim of negligent representation. The principal issue is whether a municipal employee is liable, and the municipality vicariously liable, to a buyer of property for a negligent representation of the zoning classification of that property if the buyer justifiably relies upon the representation and suffers economic loss. We affirm.

The plaintiff, Joe Rogers, was a real estate broker in Toppenish. The defendant, Ronald Kramer, was the city building inspector, whose job included administration of the zoning…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Coffey v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. King v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Evangelical United Brethren Church v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Adams v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Stevens CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Bailey v. Town of ForksWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Dinsky v. Town of FraminghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. J & B Development Co. v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Meaney v. DoddWashington Supreme Court · 1988

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API