Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Nicomen Boom Co. v. North Shore Boom & Driving Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1911No. 9000PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pacific county, Rice, J., entered April 26, 1910, in favor of the plaintiff, in contempt proceedings, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.

This is the second appeal in this case. When it was here before, the judgment was reversed, and the case “remanded with instructions to enter a judgment in accord with this opinion.” 55 Wash. 1, 103 Pac. 426. We there determined that the Nicomen Boom Company was entitled to a judgment against these appellants for the amount of forty *437cents per thousand feet, board measure, upon 42,165,453 feet of logs. The trial court thereafter, in ac'cord with that mandate, entered a judgment against the North Shore Boom & Driving Company, John W. Kleeb and John F. Hobi, and in favor of the Nicomen Boom…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Nicomen Boom Co. v. North Shore Boom & Driving Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Smith v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  3. State v. BoyceWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Dennis v. Kass & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1895
  5. State ex rel. Holgate v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Morehouse v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Miller v. Sisters of St. FrancisWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Perrault v. Emporium Department Store Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Buob v. Feenaughty MacHinery Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Davis v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API