Legal Opinion

Smith v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1899No. 3131PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County.—Hon. E. D. Benson, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Gordon, C. J.

This action was to recover damages for the removal of the lateral support of plaintiffs land. The jury returned a verdict in her favor for $150. Being dis*614satisfied with the amount of the recovery, plaintiff moved for a new trial, which motion was overruled, and she has appealed.

Respondent urges as a preliminary consideration, that the complaint does not state a cause of action, hut we think it cannot he permitted to urge the point. This cause was here on a former appeal by the plaintiff from an order of the lower court which sustained a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Davis v. KrugIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Parke v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Smith v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Morehouse v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Buob v. Feenaughty MacHinery Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Ridpath v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Schuss v. City of ChehalisWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Davis v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1925

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API