Legal Opinion

Miller v. Sisters of St. Francis

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1940No. 27998PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

The above entitled cases have heretofore been considered by this court (Miller v. Mohr, 198 Wash. 619, 89 P. (2d) 807). Before the trial in the superior court, from which the appeal was taken, they had been consolidated. One case was brought by Louis Henry Miller to recover damages for personal injuries to his son, Louis Henry Miller, Jr. In the other, the plaintiffs were Louis Henry Miller and Bertha Miller, his wife, and the purpose of the action was to recover for the loss which they had sustained, and would sustain, as the result of the injuries to their son. The defendants in both cases…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Morehouse v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Federal Iron & Brass Bed Co. v. HockWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Perrault v. Emporium Department Store Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Miller v. MohrWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Goshert v. WirthWashington Supreme Court · 1924

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. President & Directors of Georgetown College v. HughesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  2. Pierce v. Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Bailie Communications, Ltd. v. Trend Business Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  4. Blazer v. BlackCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
  5. State v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API