Legal Opinion
Dearing v. Fessler
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 25, 1949No. Civ. No. 17168PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDrapeau, J.
Plaintiff had five cypress trees growing on the rear of her lot in Alhambra. Befendants entered upon plaintiff’s property and cut down the trees. Two of the defendants were owners of the abutting property at the rear, *261along the line of which the trees were growing. The remaining defendant was a tree surgeon employed by the other two defendants to fell the trees.
Plaintiff sued, and the case was tried by jury. Verdict was in favor of the tree surgeon and against the plaintiff, and in favor of the plaintiff and against the other defendants for $1,250. The tree surgeon being eliminated, the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mazzotta v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Sacre v. Imperial Water Co. No. ThreeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Caruthers Building Co. v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Consolidated Produce Co. v. TakahashiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Sievers V.Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mundt v. Alta Bates HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Cadwell v. BoroughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953