Legal Opinion

Caruthers Building Co. v. Johnson

California Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1916No. L. A. No. 3754PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. Charles Wellborn, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

This action was brought against Parley M. Johnson to quiet the title of Caruthers Building Company to certain land in the county of Los Angeles. Johnson filed a cross-complaint, bringing in as parties various purchasers of portions of the property from Caruthers Building Company. Judgment went in favor of the building company and its grantees. Johnson appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

All of the respondents, other than Caruthers Building Company, derive their rights from that corporation, and we shall, therefore, in this opinion treat the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Herriman v. MenziesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Johnson v. Phenix InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Niles v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mundt v. Alta Bates HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Avalos v. WeltyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Dearing v. FesslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Reynolds v. EzriCare LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API