Legal Opinion
Sacre v. Imperial Water Co. No. Three
California Supreme Court
Decided December 22, 1928No. Docket No. L.A. 9894PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This appeal was submitted upon an order to show cause, the respondents having presented and filed no brief. The appeal is on the judgment-roll. The action was instituted by the plaintiff to determine the ownership of 150 shares of the capital stock of the defendant Imperial Water Company Number Three, as represented by stock certificate No. 423. The plaintiff alleged that the Imperial Water Company was at all the times mentioned in said complaint a mutual water company organized for the purpose of owning and operating a system of irrigation canals and distributing water for…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Hohn v. HohnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Mau v. McManamanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Consolidated Produce Co. v. TakahashiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Los Angeles Scenic Studios, Inc. v. Television Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1936
- Dearing v. FesslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.