Legal Opinion
Kloth v. Southern Christian University
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided July 16, 2007No. Civ. 06-244-SLRPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On April 12, 2006, Joan T. Kloth (“plaintiff’), a pro se plaintiff, filed the present action against Southern Christian University (“SCU”) and its Board of Directors (“the Board”). 1 (D.I.2) Plaintiff alleges that SCU and the Board (collectively, “defendants”) breached an implied contract to provide plaintiff with a complete education. (Id. at 14) Plaintiff also alleges that defendants discriminated against her because of her non-Christian religion, presumably in violation of Title VII of the Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Boag v. MacDougallSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Omni Capital International, Ltd. v. Rudolf Wolff & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- TriStrata Technology, Inc. v. Emulgen Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2008
- Cephalon, Inc. v. Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2009
- SOLAE, LLC v. Hershey Canada, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2008
- Shoemaker v. McConnellDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2008
- Kloth v. Southern Christian UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.