Kloth v. Southern Christian University
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Pro se litigant Joan T. Kloth appeals from the dismissal of her complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction and the denial of her motion for reconsideration by the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. We agree with the District Court that Kloth did not allege facts sufficient to establish personal jurisdiction over Defendants. We will affirm.
I
Sometime between April 2000 and September 2001, while domiciled in Connecticut, Kloth learned about Southern Christian University’s (“SCU”) distance learning program for obtaining a dual masters degree in Marriage and Family…
3Cases cited24 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by22 opinions
- Chen v. US Sports Academy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
- Jacobs v. HalperDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- American University System, Inc. v. American UniversityDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2012
- American University System, Inc. v. American UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- BGSD, INC. v. SPAZE UP LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.